Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Andresen v. Provident Bank, 04-2032 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-2032 Visitors: 49
Filed: Nov. 23, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2032 PETER C. ANDRESEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PROVIDENT BANK OF MARYLAND; GARY A. ROSEN, Trustee; Defendants - Appellees, and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-3567-AW; BK-01-25370) Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004 Before
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2032 PETER C. ANDRESEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PROVIDENT BANK OF MARYLAND; GARY A. ROSEN, Trustee; Defendants - Appellees, and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-3567-AW; BK-01-25370) Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter C. Andresen, Appellant Pro Se. Mark S. Devan, COVAHEY, BOOZER, DEVAN & DORE, P.A., Towson, Maryland; Gary A. Rosen, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Peter C. Andresen appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Andresen v. Provident Bank, No. CA-03- 3567-AW; BK-01-25370 (D. Md. filed June 30, 2004 & entered July 1, 2004; July 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer