Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lawyers Title Insurance v. Haire, 04-1308 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1308 Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 22, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1308 LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT L. HAIRE; MARY JO HAIRE, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 02-4111-CCB) Submitted: November 30, 2004 Decided: December 22, 2004 Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Onka
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1308 LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT L. HAIRE; MARY JO HAIRE, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 02-4111-CCB) Submitted: November 30, 2004 Decided: December 22, 2004 Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Onkar N. Sharma, SHARMA & BHANDARI, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellants. Gerald W. Heller, Jessica N. Drexler, LINOWES AND BLOCHER, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Robert L. Haire and Mary Jo Haire appeal from the district court’s order awarding attorney fees and costs to Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation in Lawyers Title’s action against the Haires for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, indemnity, and breach of guaranty arising out of the Haires’ sale of real estate. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion and order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. Haire, No. CA- 02-4111-CCB (D. Md. Feb. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer