Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Homecare of VA Inc v. Jones, 04-1873 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-1873 Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 21, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1873 WILLIAM S. JONES, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and HOMECARE OF VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, versus MAURICE A. JONES, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Social Services, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-417-2) Submitted: November 10, 2004 Decided: December 21, 2004 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1873 WILLIAM S. JONES, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and HOMECARE OF VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, versus MAURICE A. JONES, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Social Services, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-417-2) Submitted: November 10, 2004 Decided: December 21, 2004 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William S. Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Allen Tate Wilson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: William S. Jones, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging that the Virginia Department of Social Services wrongfully denied an application for a license renewal for Homecare of Virginia, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm because, as the district court concluded, Jones lacked standing to sue on behalf of Homecare. See Homecare of Virginia, Inc. v. Jones, No. CA-03-417-2 (E.D. Va. June 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer