Filed: Feb. 07, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7804 MARK A. BELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus I. KOLONGO, Doctor; MR. CHERRY, Superintendent; CAPTAIN HATCHETT, Director of Jail Operations, Defendants - Appellees, and LIEUTENANT FOX, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-501) Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 7, 2005 Affirmed by unpublished per cu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7804 MARK A. BELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus I. KOLONGO, Doctor; MR. CHERRY, Superintendent; CAPTAIN HATCHETT, Director of Jail Operations, Defendants - Appellees, and LIEUTENANT FOX, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-501) Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 7, 2005 Affirmed by unpublished per cur..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7804 MARK A. BELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus I. KOLONGO, Doctor; MR. CHERRY, Superintendent; CAPTAIN HATCHETT, Director of Jail Operations, Defendants - Appellees, and LIEUTENANT FOX, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-501) Submitted: January 27, 2005 Decided: February 7, 2005 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Mark A. Bell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bell v. Kolongo, No. CA-03-501 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 25 & entered Oct. 26, 2004). We deny Bell’s request in his informal brief for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
