Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Raimer, 04-7691 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-7691 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 07, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7691 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID A. RAIMER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CR-98-152-3; CA-04-706-3) Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 7, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David A. Ra
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7691 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID A. RAIMER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CR-98-152-3; CA-04-706-3) Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 7, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David A. Raimer, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: David Raimer appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(b), (c) (West 2000 & Supp. 2004), and his motion to reconsider that denial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Raimer, Nos. CR-98-152-3; CA-04-706-3 (S.D.W. Va. filed July 29, 2004 & entered July 30, 2004; Aug. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer