Filed: Mar. 25, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6038 PAUL NAGY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. F. BEELER, Warden, FMC Butner; BRYAN HERBEL, Staff Psychiatrist, FMC Butner; ROBERT COCHRAN, Staff Psychologist, FMC Butner; MS. CALHOUN, Registered Nurse, FMC Butner; DR. WALASIN, Physician, FMC Butner, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6038 PAUL NAGY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. F. BEELER, Warden, FMC Butner; BRYAN HERBEL, Staff Psychiatrist, FMC Butner; ROBERT COCHRAN, Staff Psychologist, FMC Butner; MS. CALHOUN, Registered Nurse, FMC Butner; DR. WALASIN, Physician, FMC Butner, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-6..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6038
PAUL NAGY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
A. F. BEELER, Warden, FMC Butner; BRYAN
HERBEL, Staff Psychiatrist, FMC Butner; ROBERT
COCHRAN, Staff Psychologist, FMC Butner;
MS. CALHOUN, Registered Nurse, FMC Butner;
DR. WALASIN, Physician, FMC Butner,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-617-5-FL)
Submitted: March 11, 2005 Decided: March 25, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Nagy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his Bivens* action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is
frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See Nagy v. Beeler, No. CA-04-617-5-FL
(E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 29, 2004; entered Dec. 9, 2004). We deny as
moot the motion to expedite consideration of this appeal and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to
appoint a special investigator is denied.
DISMISSED
*
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971).
- 2 -