Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gandy v. Lamit, 04-7694 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 04-7694 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 15, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7694 JIMMY GANDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN LAMIT, Warden, Florence County Detention Center; BRYAN KENNEDY, Detective; HEAD NURSES OF FLORENCE DETENTION CENTER, Defendants - Appellees, and ROBERT WELLS, Office of the Solicitor for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-02-3907
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7694 JIMMY GANDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN LAMIT, Warden, Florence County Detention Center; BRYAN KENNEDY, Detective; HEAD NURSES OF FLORENCE DETENTION CENTER, Defendants - Appellees, and ROBERT WELLS, Office of the Solicitor for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-02-3907) Submitted: April 6, 2005 Decided: April 15, 2005 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Gandy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Jimmy Gandy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gandy v. Lamit, No. CA-02- 3907 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer