Filed: Apr. 25, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6943 CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WATKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. G. COMPTON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-251-7) Submitted: January 10, 2005 Decided: April 25, 2005 Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Michael Watkins,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6943 CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WATKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. G. COMPTON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-251-7) Submitted: January 10, 2005 Decided: April 25, 2005 Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Michael Watkins, A..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6943
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WATKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
B. G. COMPTON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-251-7)
Submitted: January 10, 2005 Decided: April 25, 2005
Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Michael Watkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Michael Watkins, a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed
under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Watkins v. Compton, No. CA-04-251-7 (W.D. Va., filed
May 14, 2004; entered May 17, 2004); see also Pelissero v.
Thompson,
170 F.3d 442, 445 (4th Cir. 1999); Moscato v. Federal
Bureau of Prisons,
98 F.3d 757, 760 (3d Cir. 1996). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -