Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Johnson v. Ozmint, 05-6240 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-6240 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 26, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6240 ALEXANDER JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JON OZMINT, Director, SCDC; STAN BURTT, Warden of Lieber Correctional Institute; LISA CARRINGTON, Lieber Inmate Grievance Coordinator; J. JENKINS, Lieber Inmate Grievance Coordinator, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-03-3837-4-26BH) Submitted: May 19,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6240 ALEXANDER JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JON OZMINT, Director, SCDC; STAN BURTT, Warden of Lieber Correctional Institute; LISA CARRINGTON, Lieber Inmate Grievance Coordinator; J. JENKINS, Lieber Inmate Grievance Coordinator, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-03-3837-4-26BH) Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 26, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alexander Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Bass Lohr, Thomas A. Bendle, HOWELL, GIBSON & HUGHES, PA, Beaufort, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Alexander Johnson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Ozmint, No. CA-03-3837-4-26BH (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer