Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tunstall v. Cutler, 05-6028 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-6028 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 25, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6028 HARVEY E. TUNSTALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus S. CUTLER, SHCC Registered Nurse in her/his personal capacity; A. HARRIS, SHCC medical physician in her/his personal capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-89-1) Submitted: May 18, 2005 Decided: May 25, 2005 Before WILKINSON and D
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6028 HARVEY E. TUNSTALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus S. CUTLER, SHCC Registered Nurse in her/his personal capacity; A. HARRIS, SHCC medical physician in her/his personal capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-89-1) Submitted: May 18, 2005 Decided: May 25, 2005 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harvey E. Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se. John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Mark Raleigh Lightfoot, LAW OFFICES OF GARY L. DENTON, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Harvey E. Tunstall appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss Tunstall’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tunstall v. Cutler, No. CA-04-89-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer