Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bennett v. Cannon, 05-6841 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-6841 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 26, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6841 EDWARD B. BENNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AL CANNON, JR., Esquire; REGGIE TRIPPLETT, M.D.; NATIONAL COMMISSION OF HEALTH CARE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-22097-GRA) Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 26, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affi
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6841 EDWARD B. BENNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AL CANNON, JR., Esquire; REGGIE TRIPPLETT, M.D.; NATIONAL COMMISSION OF HEALTH CARE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-22097-GRA) Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 26, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward B. Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Pendarvis McDonald, Charleston, South Carolina; Robert Holmes Hood, Roy Pearce Maybank, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Edward B. Bennett appeals a district court judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his civil rights complaint for failing to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Bennett v. Cannon, No. CA-04-22097-GRA (D.S.C. Apr. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer