Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hampton, 05-6609 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-6609 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 25, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6609 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENNETH MARION HAMPTON, a/k/a Marion Kenneth Hampton, a/k/a Kenny Hampton, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-00-616) Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 25, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS,* and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by u
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6609 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENNETH MARION HAMPTON, a/k/a Marion Kenneth Hampton, a/k/a Kenny Hampton, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-00-616) Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 25, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS,* and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Marion Hampton, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). * Judge Williams did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2000). PER CURIAM: Kenneth Marion Hampton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hampton, No. CR-00-616 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 4, 2005 & entered Apr. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer