Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Mohamed, 05-6124 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-6124 Visitors: 39
Filed: Aug. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6124 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus YAGOUB M. MOHAMED, a/k/a Mohammed A. Yagoub, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-01-177; CA-03-58-3) Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 23, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6124 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus YAGOUB M. MOHAMED, a/k/a Mohammed A. Yagoub, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-01-177; CA-03-58-3) Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 23, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yagoub M. Mohamed, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, Gregg Robert Nivala, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Yagoub M. Mohamed appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen the time to file an appeal of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mohamed, Nos. CR-01-177; CA-03-58-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 11, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer