Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Anderson v. Pressley, 05-1780 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-1780 Visitors: 24
Filed: Dec. 01, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1780 VIVIAN A. ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT L. PRESSLEY; CYNTHIA HARRIS; ANTHONY Q. MCKINNEY; GRETCHEN BROWN; OAKWOOD COLLEGE, doing business as Global Cohesive Economics (GCE), Partners N Leveraging (PNL) 202020 Vision (20V), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-05-30-2) Submitted: No
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1780 VIVIAN A. ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT L. PRESSLEY; CYNTHIA HARRIS; ANTHONY Q. MCKINNEY; GRETCHEN BROWN; OAKWOOD COLLEGE, doing business as Global Cohesive Economics (GCE), Partners N Leveraging (PNL) 202020 Vision (20V), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-05-30-2) Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 1, 2005 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vivian A. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Ann Mullen, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Vivian A. Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for lack of service and imposing a pre- filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. Pressley, No. CA-05-30-2 (E.D. Va. June 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer