Filed: Nov. 29, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7278 MCKINLEY DAVID LITTLEJOHN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY MOODY, Safety Manager; MIKE GIBBS, Electric Foreman; CHUCK LLOYD, Counselor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-04-330-2) Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circui
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7278 MCKINLEY DAVID LITTLEJOHN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY MOODY, Safety Manager; MIKE GIBBS, Electric Foreman; CHUCK LLOYD, Counselor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-04-330-2) Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7278
MCKINLEY DAVID LITTLEJOHN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LARRY MOODY, Safety Manager; MIKE GIBBS,
Electric Foreman; CHUCK LLOYD, Counselor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-330-2)
Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
McKinley David Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Anita K. Henry,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
McKinley Littlejohn, a federal inmate, appeals a district
court order dismissing his complaint alleging that three prison
officials were deliberately indifferent to his health and safety.
We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find
Littlejohn failed to state a claim of deliberate indifference. See
Farmer v. Brennan,
511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). Accordingly, we
affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -