In Re: Hinson v., 05-7732 (2006)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: 05-7732
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 26, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7732 In Re: LEO HINSON, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (No. CR-02-120) Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 26, 2006 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leo Hinson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Leo Hinson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7732 In Re: LEO HINSON, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (No. CR-02-120) Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 26, 2006 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leo Hinson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Leo Hinson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7732 In Re: LEO HINSON, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (No. CR-02-120) Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 26, 2006 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leo Hinson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Leo Hinson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to modify his term of imprisonment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Because the district court has now ruled on Hinson’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -
Source: CourtListener
