Filed: Jan. 24, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1907 DREAMA GOUGE, d/b/a Lifestyle Furniture, Incorporated, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PENN AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-1083-2) Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 24, 2006 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unp
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1907 DREAMA GOUGE, d/b/a Lifestyle Furniture, Incorporated, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PENN AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-1083-2) Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 24, 2006 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpu..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1907 DREAMA GOUGE, d/b/a Lifestyle Furniture, Incorporated, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PENN AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-1083-2) Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 24, 2006 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dreama Gouge, Appellant Pro Se. Ancil Glenn Ramey, Angela D. Herdman, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Charleston, West Virginia; Anders W. Lindberg, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Dreama Gouge appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gouge v. Penn America Ins. Co., No. CA-04-1083-2 (S.D.W. Va. July 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
