Filed: Mar. 03, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7652 GREGORY C. EPPERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairwoman, Virginia Parole Board; GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-523) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 3, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KIN
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7652 GREGORY C. EPPERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairwoman, Virginia Parole Board; GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-523) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 3, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7652 GREGORY C. EPPERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairwoman, Virginia Parole Board; GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-523) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 3, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory C. Epperson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Gregory C. Epperson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Epperson v. Fahey, No. CA-05-523 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 23 & entered Sept. 26, 2005). We deny Epperson’s motion to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
