Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Anderson v. XYZ Correctional, 05-7523 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-7523 Visitors: 26
Filed: Feb. 27, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7523 RODNEY ELMER ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus XYZ CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; RONALD J. ANGELONE; D. A. GARRAGHTY; M. C. MILLARD; DOCTOR SWEATER; JOHN DOE; DOCTOR SWETTER; JOE DOE, Defendants - Appellees, and ANDREW J. WINSTON; JAMES A. SMITH, JR.; K. W. DAVIS; MR. ZUMMER; MARSHA FORESMAN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7523 RODNEY ELMER ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus XYZ CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; RONALD J. ANGELONE; D. A. GARRAGHTY; M. C. MILLARD; DOCTOR SWEATER; JOHN DOE; DOCTOR SWETTER; JOE DOE, Defendants - Appellees, and ANDREW J. WINSTON; JAMES A. SMITH, JR.; K. W. DAVIS; MR. ZUMMER; MARSHA FORESMAN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-02-1045-1-GBL) Submitted: February 3, 2006 Decided: February 27, 2006 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney Elmer Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Carlton Hollowell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Ashton Marie Jennette, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Rodney Elmer Anderson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as untimely under the applicable statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. XYZ Corr. Health Serv., Inc., No. CA-02-1045-1-GBL (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 26, 2005 & entered Aug. 29, 2005). We deny Anderson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer