Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Terry v. Troxler, 05-1436 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-1436 Visitors: 33
Filed: Apr. 05, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1436 In Re: GARY IVAN TERRY, Debtor. - - - - - - - - - - - - GARY IVAN TERRY, Debtor - Appellant, versus ANITA JO TROXLER, Trustee - Appellee. No. 05-1437 In Re: GARY IVAN TERRY, Debtor. - - - - - - - - - - - - GARY IVAN TERRY, Debtor - Appellant, versus ANITA JO TROXLER, Trustee - Appellee. No. 05-1438 In Re: GARY IVAN TERRY, Debtor. - - - - - - - - - - - - GARY IVAN TERRY, Debtor - Appellant, versus ANITA JO TROXLER, Tr
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1436 In Re: GARY IVAN TERRY, Debtor. - - - - - - - - - - - - GARY IVAN TERRY, Debtor - Appellant, versus ANITA JO TROXLER, Trustee - Appellee. No. 05-1437 In Re: GARY IVAN TERRY, Debtor. - - - - - - - - - - - - GARY IVAN TERRY, Debtor - Appellant, versus ANITA JO TROXLER, Trustee - Appellee. No. 05-1438 In Re: GARY IVAN TERRY, Debtor. - - - - - - - - - - - - GARY IVAN TERRY, Debtor - Appellant, versus ANITA JO TROXLER, Trustee - Appellee, - - - - - - - - - - - - ROMALLUS O. MURPHY; MICHAEL D. WEST, Movants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-135-1; CA-04-136-1; CA-03-1212; BK-01- 10713; BK-03-1212) Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 5, 2006 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. - 2 - Gary Ivan Terry, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Rebecca Harris, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 3 - PER CURIAM: Gary Ivan Terry seeks to appeal from the district court’s order dismissing his appeals from the bankruptcy court’s orders denying his motions to reopen his Chapter 13 bankruptcy case, and denying his motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. See Terry v. Troxler, Nos. CA-04-135-1; CA-04-136-1; CA-03-1212; BK-01- 10713; BK-03-1212 (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 30, 2005; entered Mar. 31, 2005). Additionally, we deny Terry’s motions for appointment of counsel and for expedited oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 4 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer