Filed: Apr. 04, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7180 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MACK RAY LITTLE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. William L. Osteen, District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-92-27-BR) Submitted: March 17, 2006 Decided: April 4, 2006 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. M
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7180 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MACK RAY LITTLE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. William L. Osteen, District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-92-27-BR) Submitted: March 17, 2006 Decided: April 4, 2006 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ma..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7180 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MACK RAY LITTLE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. William L. Osteen, District Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-92-27-BR) Submitted: March 17, 2006 Decided: April 4, 2006 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mack Ray Little, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Mack Ray Little appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Little, No. CR-92-27-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
