Filed: Apr. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2221 JAMES HUNTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HOWARD COUNTY HOUSING COMMISSION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-05-1953-WDQ) Submitted: March 29, 2006 Decided: April 12, 2006 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Hunter, Appellant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2221 JAMES HUNTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HOWARD COUNTY HOUSING COMMISSION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-05-1953-WDQ) Submitted: March 29, 2006 Decided: April 12, 2006 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Hunter, Appellant P..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2221 JAMES HUNTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HOWARD COUNTY HOUSING COMMISSION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-05-1953-WDQ) Submitted: March 29, 2006 Decided: April 12, 2006 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara McFaul Cook, County Solicitor, Ellicott City, Maryland; Carol Saffran Brinks, HOWARD COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James Hunter appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hunter v. Howard County Housing Comm’n, No. CA-05-1953-WDQ (D. Md. Oct. 5, 2005). We deny Hunter’s “Motion to Appeal the Decision and Petition for Stay” and his “Motion for Summary and/or Default Judgment.” Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -