Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Koha v. Gonzales, 05-2267 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-2267 Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 18, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2267 LISE ADRIANI KOHA, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-623-399) Submitted: March 31, 2006 Decided: April 18, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Howard T. Mei, LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD T. MEI, Bethesda, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Att
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2267 LISE ADRIANI KOHA, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-623-399) Submitted: March 31, 2006 Decided: April 18, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Howard T. Mei, LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD T. MEI, Bethesda, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Diane Kelleher, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Lise Adriani Koha, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal and withholding under the Convention Against Torture. We deny the petition for review. The INA authorizes the Attorney General to confer asylum on any refugee. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a) (2000). It defines a refugee as a person unwilling or unable to return to her native country “because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) (2000). Substantial evidence supports the finding that Koha failed to show entitlement to asylum because the past events that were the basis for her asylum application did not establish persecution.* Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED * We note Koha has abandoned challenges to the immigration judge’s decision that she was not eligible for withholding from removal or withholding under the CAT. She did not raise challenges to these findings in her brief. - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer