Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Burks v. Pate, 05-7321 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-7321 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 28, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7321 TROY LUKE BURKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN PATE, Acting Warden; BETTY E. ALBRITTON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; P. FELDER, Unit Sergeant; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-4014-3) Submitted: April 17, 2006 Decided: April 28, 2006 Before WI
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7321 TROY LUKE BURKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN PATE, Acting Warden; BETTY E. ALBRITTON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; P. FELDER, Unit Sergeant; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-4014-3) Submitted: April 17, 2006 Decided: April 28, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Troy Luke Burks, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, Marshall Hodges Waldron, Jr., CAROLINA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, Bluffton, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Troy Luke Burks appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Burks v. Pate, No. CA-02-4014-3 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 8, 2005 & entered Aug. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer