Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Ellis, 06-6389 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-6389 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 08, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6389 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARDY LAMONT ELLIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:00-cr-00084-JBF) Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 8, 2006 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mard
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6389 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARDY LAMONT ELLIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:00-cr-00084-JBF) Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 8, 2006 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mardy Lamont Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Mardy Lamont Ellis appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Request Amendment to PSR” and his “Motion for Leave of Court to Move Sentencing Judge to Reduce Sentence Pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rule 35) Substantial Assistance.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ellis, No. 2:00-cr-00084- JBF (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 15, 2006; entered Feb. 16, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer