Filed: Jun. 29, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6127 JAMES WILKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIEUTENANT R. CONNER; W. J. TOWNLEY, Superintendent; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARBOUR; MS. CHEEKS, Food Services Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees, and WARDEN HALIFAX C.C.; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:03
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6127 JAMES WILKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIEUTENANT R. CONNER; W. J. TOWNLEY, Superintendent; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARBOUR; MS. CHEEKS, Food Services Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees, and WARDEN HALIFAX C.C.; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:03-..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6127 JAMES WILKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIEUTENANT R. CONNER; W. J. TOWNLEY, Superintendent; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARBOUR; MS. CHEEKS, Food Services Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees, and WARDEN HALIFAX C.C.; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:03-cv-00815-JCC) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 29, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. Noelle Leigh Shaw-Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James Wilkins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilkins v. Conner, No. 1:03-cv-00815-JCC (E.D. Va. Dec. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -