Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McNeil v. Bazzle, 06-6221 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-6221 Visitors: 30
Filed: Jun. 29, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6221 JAMES ELLIOTT MCNEIL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD E. BAZZLE, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution; J. BRATKA, Officer at Perry Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (2:05-cv-00240-HMH) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 29, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, an
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6221 JAMES ELLIOTT MCNEIL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD E. BAZZLE, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution; J. BRATKA, Officer at Perry Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (2:05-cv-00240-HMH) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 29, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Elliott McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James Elliott McNeil appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeil v. Bazzle, No. 2:05-cv-00240-HMH (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer