Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Lloyd, 06-1101 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1101 Visitors: 49
Filed: Jun. 28, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1101 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NANCY E. LLOYD, individually and doing business as Wings of Freedom, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:04-cv-00274-NCT) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirme
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1101 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NANCY E. LLOYD, individually and doing business as Wings of Freedom, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:04-cv-00274-NCT) Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nancy E. Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Curtis Clarence Pett, Andrea R. Tebbets, Richard T. Morrison, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Nancy E. Lloyd appeals the district court’s order granting a permanent injunction against her based on her activities in promoting abusive tax shelters. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lloyd, No. 1:04-cv- 00274-NCT (M.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 2005). We deny Lloyd’s motion for a stay, deny the motions for sanctions, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer