Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Stepp v. Holland, 05-2433 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-2433 Visitors: 71
Filed: Jul. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2433 BENNIE E. STEPP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL H. HOLLAND; B. V. HYLER; STEVE SCHAAB; MARTY HUDSON, Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan and Trust; UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA 1974 PENSION PLAN AND TRUST, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-04-1062-5)
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2433 BENNIE E. STEPP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL H. HOLLAND; B. V. HYLER; STEVE SCHAAB; MARTY HUDSON, Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan and Trust; UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA 1974 PENSION PLAN AND TRUST, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-04-1062-5) Submitted: May 22, 2006 Decided: July 12, 2006 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome J. McFadden, Princeton, West Virginia, for Appellant. Glenda S. Finch, Deputy General Counsel, Christopher F. Clarke, Senior Assistant General Counsel, UMWA HEALTH AND RETIREMENT FUNDS, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Bennie Stepp appeals from the district court’s opinion and order upholding the decision by the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust denying disability benefits. Stepp asserts that the Trustees’ determination that there was no causal link between his mine injury and his disability constituted an abuse of discretion. After reviewing the record de novo, we find that the Trustees did not abuse their discretion in denying disability benefits. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See Stepp v. Holland, No. 5:04-cv-01062 (S.D. W. Va. Nov. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral arguments because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer