Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Willingham v. Crooke, 06-1293 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1293 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 21, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1293 GLORIA WILLINGHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, and CARL JACKSON, Plaintiff, versus GRAHAM BUCK, Officer; DOUGLAS A. CROOKE, Defendants - Appellees, and SHERRY A. BASSETT, Officer; OFFICER BRIAN; J. THOMAS MANGER; FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; COUNTY OF FAIRFAX; ANTHONY GRIFFIN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior Distri
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1293 GLORIA WILLINGHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, and CARL JACKSON, Plaintiff, versus GRAHAM BUCK, Officer; DOUGLAS A. CROOKE, Defendants - Appellees, and SHERRY A. BASSETT, Officer; OFFICER BRIAN; J. THOMAS MANGER; FAIRFAX COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; COUNTY OF FAIRFAX; ANTHONY GRIFFIN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:00-cv-02053-CMH) Submitted: June 30, 2006 Decided: July 21, 2006 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gloria Willingham, Appellant Pro Se. David John Fudala, Fairfax Virginia; Robert Marvel Ross, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Gloria Willingham appeals the district court’s judgment entered in favor of the Defendant in accordance with the jury verdict in her civil rights trial. We have reviewed the record and Willingham’s claims and find no reversible error. We find no error with the admission of the testimony challenged by Willingham. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer