Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Glover v. Ozmint, 06-6448 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-6448 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 27, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6448 TEKOA T. GLOVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections in individual and official capacity; RICHARD E. BAZZLE, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution in individual and official capacity; STEPHEN CLAYTOR, Associate Warden of Perry Correctional Institution in individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court fo
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6448 TEKOA T. GLOVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections in individual and official capacity; RICHARD E. BAZZLE, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution in individual and official capacity; STEPHEN CLAYTOR, Associate Warden of Perry Correctional Institution in individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (0:06-cv-00122-HFF) Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 27, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tekoa T. Glover, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Tekoa T. Glover appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Glover v. Ozmint, No. 0:06-cv-00122-HFF (D.S.C. filed Feb. 23, 2006 & entered Feb. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer