Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re: Kebe v., 06-6726 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-6726 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 31, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6726 In Re: ANDRE KEBE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:97-cr-00357) Submitted: July 17, 2006 Decided: July 31, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Kebe, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Andre Kebe petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the dist
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6726 In Re: ANDRE KEBE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:97-cr-00357) Submitted: July 17, 2006 Decided: July 31, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Kebe, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Andre Kebe petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks release from imprisonment based on the delay. After Kebe filed the instant mandamus petition, the district court ruled on his § 2255 motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. PETITION DENIED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer