Filed: Aug. 09, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1290 DELZOLA M. CUFFEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:04-cv-00381-WDK) Submitted: July 21, 2006 Decided: August 9, 2006 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Delzola M. Cuffee,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1290 DELZOLA M. CUFFEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:04-cv-00381-WDK) Submitted: July 21, 2006 Decided: August 9, 2006 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Delzola M. Cuffee, A..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1290 DELZOLA M. CUFFEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:04-cv-00381-WDK) Submitted: July 21, 2006 Decided: August 9, 2006 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Delzola M. Cuffee, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Delzola M. Cuffee, an African American female, appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to her employer in her civil action in which she alleged discrimination and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cuffee v. Tidewater Cmty. Coll., No. 2:04-cv- 00381-WDK (E.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
