Filed: Sep. 07, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7161 In Re: DOUGLAS L. JOHNSON, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (0:01-cr-00677) Submitted: August 25, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006 Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas L. Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Douglas
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7161 In Re: DOUGLAS L. JOHNSON, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (0:01-cr-00677) Submitted: August 25, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006 Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas L. Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Douglas L..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7161 In Re: DOUGLAS L. JOHNSON, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (0:01-cr-00677) Submitted: August 25, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006 Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas L. Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Douglas L. Johnson petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to enforce plea agreement. After Johnson filed the instant mandamus petition, the district court conducted a hearing on the motion. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decision process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -
