Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McDonald v. Sowers, 05-7091 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 05-7091 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 31, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7091 PAUL MCDONALD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RODRICK R. SOWERS, Warden; M. STAUFFER, CO #2, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 04-4035-PJM) Submitted: April 26, 2006 Decided: October 31, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG,* and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul McDona
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7091 PAUL MCDONALD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RODRICK R. SOWERS, Warden; M. STAUFFER, CO #2, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 04-4035-PJM) Submitted: April 26, 2006 Decided: October 31, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG,* and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul McDonald, Appellant Pro Se. David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). * Judge Luttig was a member of the original panel but did not participate in this decision. This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). PER CURIAM: Paul McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McDonald v. Sowers, No. CA-04-4035-PJM (D. Md. June 20, 2005). We deny McDonald’s motions for appointment of counsel and for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer