Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bullock v. Rehrig International Inc, 06-1613 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1613 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 28, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1613 CASSANDRA F. BULLOCK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus REHRIG INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cv-00697-JRS) Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: December 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hen
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1613 CASSANDRA F. BULLOCK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus REHRIG INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cv-00697-JRS) Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: December 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry W. McLaughlin, III, CENTRAL VIRGINIA LEGAL AID SOCIETY, INC., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. James P. McElligott, Jr., MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cassandra F. Bullock appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Rehrig International, Inc., on Bullock’s sex discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bullock v. Rehrig Int’l, Inc., No. 3:05-cv-00697-JRS (E.D. Va. May 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer