Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Roberts v. Baptist Hospital, 06-1835 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1835 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jan. 18, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1835 VICKIE L. MCIVER ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BAPTIST HOSPITAL, Director, Employee Relations; GOODWILL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:06-mc-00059-FWB) Submitted: December 29, 2006 Decided: Janu
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1835 VICKIE L. MCIVER ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BAPTIST HOSPITAL, Director, Employee Relations; GOODWILL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:06-mc-00059-FWB) Submitted: December 29, 2006 Decided: January 18, 2007 Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vickie L. McIver Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Kristine Marie Howard, Penni Pearson Bradshaw, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC, Winston- Salem, North Carolina; Dorothy Powers, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Vickie L. McIver Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying leave to file a new civil action pursuant to the district court’s prior order imposing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Roberts v. Baptist Hosp., No. 1:06-mc-00059-FWB (M.D.N.C. July 5, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer