Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rodriguez v. Ashcroft, 06-1878 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1878 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jan. 22, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1878 VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General; KENNETH R. JONES, Recreation Supervisor, Federal Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (9:04-cv-22105-CWH) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 22, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GRE
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1878 VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General; KENNETH R. JONES, Recreation Supervisor, Federal Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (9:04-cv-22105-CWH) Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 22, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Hearn Bailey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Victor Rodriguez appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and denying Rodriguez’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rodriguez v. Ashcroft, No. 9:04-cv-22105-CWH (D.S.C. June 13, 2006; July 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer