Filed: Jan. 30, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7341 MICHAEL A. WEBB, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR BAILEY, Dentist; MISS MESSEN, Dental Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00345-gec-mf) Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 30, 2007 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7341 MICHAEL A. WEBB, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR BAILEY, Dentist; MISS MESSEN, Dental Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00345-gec-mf) Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 30, 2007 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by u..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7341 MICHAEL A. WEBB, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR BAILEY, Dentist; MISS MESSEN, Dental Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00345-gec-mf) Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 30, 2007 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael A. Webb appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(6)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Webb v. Ray, 7:06-CV-00343-gec-mf (W.D. Va. June 6, 2006).* We deny Webb’s motion for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Ray was removed as a party on appeal. - 2 -
