Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Davis v. United States, 06-6504 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-6504 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 30, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6504 MATTHEW DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ALBERTO R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General; ANNA MILLS WAGONER, USAO MDNC; JONATHAN S. GASSER, USAO DSC; BARBARA M. BOWENS, AUSA DSC; WARDEN, Charleston Detention Center, all in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Ma
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6504 MATTHEW DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ALBERTO R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General; ANNA MILLS WAGONER, USAO MDNC; JONATHAN S. GASSER, USAO DSC; BARBARA M. BOWENS, AUSA DSC; WARDEN, Charleston Detention Center, all in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (2:05-cv-00747-MBS) Submitted: October 2, 2006 Decided: January 30, 2007 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Lee Ellis Berlinsky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina; Eugene P. Corrigan, III, GRIMBALL & CABANISS, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Matthew Davis, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice for improper venue. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Davis v. United States, No. 2:05-cv-00747-MBS (D.S.C. Feb. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Although the magistrate judge indicated that Davis is incarcerated in the Middle District of North Carolina, we note that Davis is incarcerated at FCI-Butner, which is located in the Eastern District of North Carolina. Thus, Davis’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) claims properly belong in the Eastern District of North Carolina. - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer