Filed: Feb. 16, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1642 SONIA JEANNINE BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CARILION HEALTH SYSTEM; CARILION CONSOLIDATED LABS, Defendants - Appellees, and JUDY SNIPES; RANDY VANDEVANDER; RAYMOND DUBOSE; MARK MURPHY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:05-cv-00487) Submitted: February 7, 2007 Decided: February 16, 2007 Before MICHAEL, K
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1642 SONIA JEANNINE BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CARILION HEALTH SYSTEM; CARILION CONSOLIDATED LABS, Defendants - Appellees, and JUDY SNIPES; RANDY VANDEVANDER; RAYMOND DUBOSE; MARK MURPHY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:05-cv-00487) Submitted: February 7, 2007 Decided: February 16, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KI..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1642 SONIA JEANNINE BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CARILION HEALTH SYSTEM; CARILION CONSOLIDATED LABS, Defendants - Appellees, and JUDY SNIPES; RANDY VANDEVANDER; RAYMOND DUBOSE; MARK MURPHY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:05-cv-00487) Submitted: February 7, 2007 Decided: February 16, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sonia Jeannine Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Kenneth Friedman, Agnis Chandra Chakravorty, WOODS ROGERS, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Sonia Jeannine Brown appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Carilion Health Sys., No. 7:05-cv-00487 (W.D. Va. May 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -