Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Al-Amin v. Allen, 06-8054 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-8054 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 30, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-8054 RASHID QAWI AL-AMIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE F. ALLEN, Governor, United States Senator of Virginia, in his individual and former official capacity as Governor of the State of Virginia; MARK R. WARNER, Governor of Virginia, in his individual and official capacity; JIM GILMORE, Virginia's anti-terrorism officer, in his individual and former official capacity as Governor of Virginia; HELEN FAHEY, in her indiv
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-8054 RASHID QAWI AL-AMIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE F. ALLEN, Governor, United States Senator of Virginia, in his individual and former official capacity as Governor of the State of Virginia; MARK R. WARNER, Governor of Virginia, in his individual and official capacity; JIM GILMORE, Virginia's anti-terrorism officer, in his individual and former official capacity as Governor of Virginia; HELEN FAHEY, in her individual and official capacity as Chairwoman of the Virginia Parole Board, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:05-cv-00672-RAJ) Submitted: March 22, 2007 Decided: March 30, 2007 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rashid Qawi Al-Amin, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Rashid Qawi Al-Amin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Al-Amin v. Allen, No. 2:05-cv-00672-RAJ (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 2006). We deny Al-Amin’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer