Filed: Apr. 06, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6167 ANTHONY L. ODOM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LANCE P. FORSYTHE, Superintendent; DR. OFAGH; NURSE JUSTICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00802-TSE) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 6, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6167 ANTHONY L. ODOM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LANCE P. FORSYTHE, Superintendent; DR. OFAGH; NURSE JUSTICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00802-TSE) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 6, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6167 ANTHONY L. ODOM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LANCE P. FORSYTHE, Superintendent; DR. OFAGH; NURSE JUSTICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00802-TSE) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 6, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony L. Odom, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony L. Odom appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the court’s prior dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Forsythe, No. 1:06-cv-00802-TSE (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 16, 2007 & entered Jan. 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
