Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Royster v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail, 06-7900 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-7900 Visitors: 27
Filed: Apr. 05, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7900 ROBERT ROYSTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL; PORTSMOUTH CITY JAIL; PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, INCORPORATED, and their employees that work at Hampton Roads Regional Jail; DOCTOR KOLONGO; J. ROD CLIPP; J. WHITE, PPV; P. RN; BRODY-MYRIE, NP; CAPTAIN HACTHER; THE TESTING LAB IF OTHER THAN PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED; THE CITY MANAGER OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7900 ROBERT ROYSTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL; PORTSMOUTH CITY JAIL; PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, INCORPORATED, and their employees that work at Hampton Roads Regional Jail; DOCTOR KOLONGO; J. ROD CLIPP; J. WHITE, PPV; P. RN; BRODY-MYRIE, NP; CAPTAIN HACTHER; THE TESTING LAB IF OTHER THAN PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED; THE CITY MANAGER OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00323-JRS) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 5, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Royster, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Royster appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Royster v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail, No. 3:06-cv-00323-JRS (E.D. Va. Oct. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer