Filed: Apr. 04, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6175 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY H. WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:01-cr-00231-RAJ; 2:04-cv-00129-RAJ) Submitted: March 7, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney H. Will
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6175 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY H. WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:01-cr-00231-RAJ; 2:04-cv-00129-RAJ) Submitted: March 7, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney H. Willi..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6175 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY H. WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:01-cr-00231-RAJ; 2:04-cv-00129-RAJ) Submitted: March 7, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney H. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rodney H. Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for transcripts at Government expense. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Williams, Nos. 2:01-cr-00231-RAJ; 2:04-cv-00129-RAJ (E.D. Va. Jan. 18, 2007). We deny Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
