Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Hutchinson, 06-7804 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-7804 Visitors: 24
Filed: Apr. 04, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7804 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NEVILLE A. HUTCHINSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00206-JCC; 1:03-cv-00683-JCC) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7804 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NEVILLE A. HUTCHINSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00206-JCC; 1:03-cv-00683-JCC) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Neville A. Hutchinson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Neville A. Hutchinson seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of several incomprehensible pleadings construed by the court as post-judgment motions in Hutchinson’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) proceeding. By failing to challenge the district court’s characterization of his pleadings or the grounds for denying relief, Hutchinson has waived appellate review of the district court’s order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.”). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer