Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sawyer v. Potash Corporation, 06-1429 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1429 Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 04, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1429 D’ANNA RUSSO SAWYER, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Douglas Gray Sawyer, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN, a/k/a and d/b/a PCS Administration(USA), Inc. as Policy Holder, Plan Sponsor, Participating Employer; PCS U.S. FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN; EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, as Plan Administrator; PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Plan Sponsors and Plan Administrators of Health
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1429 D’ANNA RUSSO SAWYER, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Douglas Gray Sawyer, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN, a/k/a and d/b/a PCS Administration(USA), Inc. as Policy Holder, Plan Sponsor, Participating Employer; PCS U.S. FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN; EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, as Plan Administrator; PCS PHOSPHATE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Plan Sponsors and Plan Administrators of Health and Welfare Plans; AIG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, as Plan Insurers; AIG CLAIM SERVICES, INCORPORATED, as Plan Insurers and Administrators, Defendants - Appellees, and JOHN DOES 1-5; AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INCORPORATED, as Plan Insurers, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:04-cv-00078-H) Submitted: March 14, 2007 Decided: April 4, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. D’Anna Russo Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel McKinley Gray, III, WARD & SMITH, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina; Jeremy R. Sayre, WARD & SMITH, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina; Ann S. Estridge, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, Robert Boyd Jones, Jr., CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: D’Anna Russo Sawyer appeals the district court’s order dismissing her action filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001-1461 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sawyer’s motion for stay and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sawyer v. Potash Corp., No. 4:04-cv-00078-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer