Filed: Apr. 02, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2063 FLOYD BRUCE MOBLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; JAMES J. BLOUNT, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00139-JBF) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 2, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2063 FLOYD BRUCE MOBLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; JAMES J. BLOUNT, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00139-JBF) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 2, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affir..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2063 FLOYD BRUCE MOBLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT; JAMES J. BLOUNT, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00139-JBF) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 2, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Floyd Bruce Mobley, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Brody Rashkind, FURNISS, DAVIS, RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Floyd Bruce Mobley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mobley v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:06-cv-00139-JBF (E.D. Va. Aug. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
