Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ayres v. Jackson, 06-1875 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 06-1875 Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 02, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1875 ANGELA AYRES, d/b/a S & A Development Group, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALPHONSO JACKSON, Secretary of HUD; JAMES KELLY, Director, Department of Housing and Urban Development; JACKIE FANTUZO, Public Information Officer; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00340-CCB) Subm
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1875 ANGELA AYRES, d/b/a S & A Development Group, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALPHONSO JACKSON, Secretary of HUD; JAMES KELLY, Director, Department of Housing and Urban Development; JACKIE FANTUZO, Public Information Officer; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00340-CCB) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 2, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Angela Ayres, Appellant Pro Se. David M. Cohen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Angela Ayers appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her civil complaint and her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ayres v. Jackson, No. 1:06-cv-00340-CCB (D. Md. July 21, 2006). We deny the parties’ motions to amend the caption. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer