Filed: May 02, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6064 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GEORGE ALLEN WARD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:94-cr-00070-HCM) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 2, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Allen W
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6064 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GEORGE ALLEN WARD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:94-cr-00070-HCM) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 2, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Allen Wa..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6064 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GEORGE ALLEN WARD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:94-cr-00070-HCM) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 2, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Allen Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George Allen Ward seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000 & Supp. 2006), and to compel the government to file a motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ward, No. 4:94-cr-00070-HCM (E.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
